Gynocentrism
is what binds feminism together across the political spectrum from left to right. The left differs
from the right because it adds leftist ideology to the gynocentric mix. This
"empowers" women to do a lot of things which traditionalism would not
permit. You might say that the 'left' gives women a whole new set of
power tools.
And yet, please observe that there is no general feminist
outcry for women to give up traditional gynocentric advantages from the
the right (i.e. chivalry). That makes perfect sense because if women
actually did give up those traditional advantages, it would make the left version of feminism collapse and expire.
In the end, the feminist left gets the bulk of its blood supply from the feminist right. And that blood supply is nothing less than old-school gynocentrism.
Wednesday, January 30, 2013
The Femplex -- Feminism's Cultural Supply Chain
Feminism may be defined as "the project to increase the power of women". Once we get that axiom firmly anchored in enough people's brains, things can begin to move forward.
In other words, feminism is FEMALE SUPREMACISM. And whatever supports or boosts the female supremacist project is a part of feminism's cultural supply chain -- otherwise known as the Feministical Operations Complex (or "femplex" for short).
The femplex extends throughout the entire culture --- all of it, not merely the 'left' or the 'right' of it.
The word "feminism" generates confusion because it is applied to some parts of the femplex, but not others. In consequence, whoever would mobilize against what feminism has wrought lacks an efficient way of thinking and talking about the situation. Clearly, an holistic understanding must be imparted to such people.
In other words, feminism is FEMALE SUPREMACISM. And whatever supports or boosts the female supremacist project is a part of feminism's cultural supply chain -- otherwise known as the Feministical Operations Complex (or "femplex" for short).
The femplex extends throughout the entire culture --- all of it, not merely the 'left' or the 'right' of it.
The word "feminism" generates confusion because it is applied to some parts of the femplex, but not others. In consequence, whoever would mobilize against what feminism has wrought lacks an efficient way of thinking and talking about the situation. Clearly, an holistic understanding must be imparted to such people.
Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Feminism's Essence is Visible to Outsiders from Where They Stand
If feminists were honest, they would call themselves what they are:
female supremacists. But they can't afford to be honest because they are
playing a game of stealth and they need to be surreptitious. So they
call themselves "feminists" because it is easier to sell that name to the general public.
The complete phenomenology of female supremacism outdistances what any given feminist would openly acknowledge to be feminism, and the word feminism itself operates as a misdirection of attention. So if we marshall our understanding according to feminist categories, we will never stop looking where the feminist finger is pointing, and that finger will never point us toward victory or truth. Indeed, it will never point us toward anything but a continually evolving female supremacist future.
And that is why we should brush aside quite brusquely what feminists say about feminism. We non-feminists in general, and men in particular, are on the receiving end of feminist innovation. The impact is on US, so we have a perfect right to say what feminism is or isn't from our own end of the transaction. Our input upon that point is as valid as any. We know best of all where the shoe pinches our foot.
The complete phenomenology of female supremacism outdistances what any given feminist would openly acknowledge to be feminism, and the word feminism itself operates as a misdirection of attention. So if we marshall our understanding according to feminist categories, we will never stop looking where the feminist finger is pointing, and that finger will never point us toward victory or truth. Indeed, it will never point us toward anything but a continually evolving female supremacist future.
And that is why we should brush aside quite brusquely what feminists say about feminism. We non-feminists in general, and men in particular, are on the receiving end of feminist innovation. The impact is on US, so we have a perfect right to say what feminism is or isn't from our own end of the transaction. Our input upon that point is as valid as any. We know best of all where the shoe pinches our foot.
Thursday, January 24, 2013
Taking Control of the Definition and the Discourse
In the end, we aim to establish two things: firstly, what feminism
IS. . . and secondly, whether it is DESIRABLE. Up until now, the
feminists have held a monopoly of discourse in this realm,
thought-policing the avenues of conversation leading into it or out of
it and transforming the world of respectable mainstream opinion into an
echo chamber where only feminist questions are permitted to be raised,
and only feminist answers permitted to be formulated.
Not surprisingly therefore, the feminists have concluded that feminism is both desirable and honorable. However, they have consistently shrouded in fog the plain and simple definition of feminism, making available so many so-called "answers", and such inadequate ones, that there is effectively no answer at all. And that, I submit, is the weak point where we as counter-feminist seekers of truth must begin our drilling operations.
Not surprisingly therefore, the feminists have concluded that feminism is both desirable and honorable. However, they have consistently shrouded in fog the plain and simple definition of feminism, making available so many so-called "answers", and such inadequate ones, that there is effectively no answer at all. And that, I submit, is the weak point where we as counter-feminist seekers of truth must begin our drilling operations.
Feminism Has Reason to be Fearful
Supporters of the feminist regime are getting scared. I have a keen nose, and I can smell their fear in the wind. Well they should
be fearful. If I were them, I too would be brimming over with fear and
guilt, and I would be pulling back into my shell with all deliberate
speed, doing as much damage control as possible along my line of
retreat. Then I would stay out of sight for a good long while, quietly
licking my wounds and pulling my thoughts together. Yes, that is what I
would be doing if I were them. I speak from a place of empathy. Get it?
Very well. When all of this is over, when the smoke has cleared and the dust has settled, post-feminist society will differ profoundly from both feminist society and pre-feminist society. The lessons of history will need to be instilled -- and I mean pedagogically instilled! -- and the culture will need to be transformed in such a way that this kind of thing never, never, ever happens again.
Very well. When all of this is over, when the smoke has cleared and the dust has settled, post-feminist society will differ profoundly from both feminist society and pre-feminist society. The lessons of history will need to be instilled -- and I mean pedagogically instilled! -- and the culture will need to be transformed in such a way that this kind of thing never, never, ever happens again.
You Can't Dismantle Feminism With Feminist Tools
We reject any method of studying feminism which commences by adopting the feminist worldview, recognizing that any feminist definition of feminism can only be a product of that worldview -- a worldview we do not share! As non-feminist philosophers, we understand that you cannot begin within feminism and then argue your way out of it by using feminist vocabulary and discourse to pave your road. No. You must declare yourself alien to feminism as a necessary first step; you must occupy the Archimedian standpoint and proceed from there.
The radical feminist Audre Lorde once famously remarked that "you cannot dismantle the master's house with the master's tools." As non-feminist philosophers, we understand feminism on independent terms, and we have not formulated our conclusion through any feminist chain of reasoning. So our strategy is to reframe the entire discussion, forcing them to engage our issues on our terms while roadblocking their customary avenues of evasion.
The radical feminist Audre Lorde once famously remarked that "you cannot dismantle the master's house with the master's tools." As non-feminist philosophers, we understand feminism on independent terms, and we have not formulated our conclusion through any feminist chain of reasoning. So our strategy is to reframe the entire discussion, forcing them to engage our issues on our terms while roadblocking their customary avenues of evasion.
Wednesday, January 23, 2013
Simple Message to the General Female Population
Feminism has driven you fifty miles out into the country and left you there to fend for yourselves. Yes, it is unwise to take rides from strangers. Now you've got some walking to do, but hopefully the exercise will prove beneficial. I am the messenger.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)