More and more women are speaking out against feminism and a lot of men in the activated community are acting cynical about the motives of such women. Such men are voicing fears of "infiltration" by such women, and are sure that such women are up to no good. I understand what these men are saying and, up to a point, I share their concerns. It is undoubtedly true that an uncontrolled female presence in the wrong sectors will set things back -- and I say this in a spirit of realism and pragmatism, trusting that others will weigh my sentiments accordingly.
However, I cannot agree that openly anti-feminist rhetoric
among women is anything but a positive development. Seriously, if women themselves are
denouncing feminism it cannot bode well for feminism, can it?
But I would allow that SOME of these women are plotting to subvert
male autonomy, and hence, the non-feminist revolution as a whole. That said, I would
propose a simple method for detecting them and weeding them out. You
must monitor every purportedly anti-feminist woman to ascertain that
she is walking the pro-male walk, and not simply talking the
anti-feminist talk. So question the candidate about the sanctity of male
space. If for any reason at all, she bristles at the idea that men
should have times and places where women are excluded, you should
immediately toss her application onto the reject pile. By contrast,
women who are fine with that idea will get a relatively high
security clearance, and be groomed as leaders of other women.